Akhanda Bharatam

Click here to know about Akhanda Bharatam (अखंड भारतम्)

Sanatana Dharmam

Click here to know about Sanatana Dharmam (सनातन दर्मम्) and Hinduism

Sunday, 17 March 2013

Gandhi Nehru Family Myth Exposed Part 1



Today one of the major political parties in India is the Indian national congress. But behind this political party there is a great myth. ‘Gandhi–Nehru Family’ 


Every day the newspapers and the news channels are replete with eulogizing references of the so called ‘Gandhi -Nehru –Family’, having as its current members Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. This generally is known as the number one family of the country for its claim particularly of an ancestry which has given three prime ministers to India. This family quite directly and rightfully connects itself to its maternal side, especially the Nehru legacy, which is related to the father of Sonia Gandhi’s mother-in-law or the father of the grandmother of Rahul or Priyanka. However, what causes a rising of the eyebrows in general in the public is this family’s apparently becoming beneficiary of the equivocating use of the surname ‘Gandhi’. The political benefits of the use of epithets connecting them with the Nehru–Gandhi legacy more than counterbalances everything else notwithstanding the willing or unwilling acquiescence in such use by the current members of this family or the possibility of advantage being bequeathed to them by the media or such other agencies in their knowingness or ignorance.

The advantages no doubt are obtrusive as, while their Nehru legacy establishes a clear connection with India’s most fiery leader or the potential heir apparent of the days of the national movement and its subsequent first prime minister, the use of Gandhi surname fetches them richer legacy. They gain more here because, more than representing their straight connection with Indira Gandhi, this surname, giving them the benefit of doubt, finds them placed in direct lineage of Mahatma Gandhi in the eyes of the millions living in rural India. The use of word ‘Gandhi’ makes people at once establish connections with the luminary father figure and internationally acclaimed apostle of non-violence of the days of India’s freedom struggle straight away, especially when it is uttered jointly with the name of Jawaharlal Nehru. Does it not seem of worth then to re-visit memory lane and be inquisitive as to how and why such a situation could develop? Or, is it not also of worth to try and unfold this myth and bring it closer to the stark realities of circumstances in chronology permitting and ensuring a more objective political assessment of persons and situations?

Myths:

1. Nehru is not actually their surname and they have adopted it. You can never find any other Nehru before Gangadhar Nehru, whose actual name is Gayasuddin ghazi.
2. The so called Gandhi-Nehru family members of today are not at all related to Mahatma Gandhi.
3. They have adopted the name Gandhi on the advice of Mahatma Gandhi, as it is politically useful very much, when Indira married to Feroz Gandhi whose mother is Rati Mai Gundhi (Gundhi and not to be confused with Gandhi, Gundhis are perfume sellers in Gujarat at that time).   
4. They are actually related to the Mughals and to the Mongol emperor, Chengizkhan.
5. Frankly speaking, present day Gandhi’s are the mixture of religions. They don’t belong to any single religion and in fact belongs to Islam, Christianity and Hinduism. 
6. They initially belong to Hinduism (Kashmiri pandits) and then converted to Islam. These Muslim people converted to Christianity after Sonia’s entrance into the family. 
7. This may be controversial, but the facts are

a. Jawaharlal Nehru’s actual father is Mobaraq Ali and not the Motilal Nehru.
b. Indira priyadarsini’s actual name is Maimuna begum and she is the daughter of Manzoor Ali and not the Jawaharlal Nehru.
c. Sanjay Gandhi is not the son of Feroz Gandhi, but the son of Mohammad Younis.
d. No one knows the actual father of Sonia Gandhi and Stephen Eugene Maino is not her real father (i.e. Biological father).
e. Sonia was an agent in KGB when she was married to Rajiv (KGB is Russian external intelligence agency like American CIA and Indian RAW)

There are many more myths about this family. I will explain you clearly about each and every myth I have mentioned here in my next articles. So Keep reading and know how this family has ruined India.  I felt it is better to explain everything clearly in more articles rather than single large article.  
 

Gandhi Nehru Family Myth Exposed Part 2



In this article I am going to reveal the facts that
1. How Gandhi Nehru family is related to Chengizkhan and Mughals.
2. How they have adopted the name Nehru as their surname.
3. How these Kashmiri pandits converted to Islam.

How Gandhi Nehru family is related to Chengizkhan and Mughals?

I have told you already about the fact that the present day Gandhi’s are not at all related to Mahatma Gandhi and they are actually related to the emperor of Mongol Empire, the Chengizkhan.

Let me elaborate this. I think you all are aware of the Mughal dynasty that it was founded in India when Zahir ud-din Muhammad Babur (who was a descendent of Chengiz Khan), hailing from Ferghana (Modern Uzbekistan), invaded parts of Northern India. Initially he undertook raids up to 1524 and had established his base camp at Peshawar. Finally in 1526 in his fifth attempt, Babur defeated the last of the Delhi Sultans, Ibrahim Shah Lodi, the ruler of Delhi, at the First Battle of Panipat. Humayun, Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan, Aurangzeb Alamgir, Bahadur shah, Farrukhsiyar all are his descendents. Furrukhsiyar is the person of importance here.

Babur---Humayun---Akbar---Jahangir---Shahjahan---Aurangzeb Alamgir---Bahadur shah---Farrukhsiyar.

This Mughal king Farrukhsiyar who, on a visit to Kashmir brought Raj Kaul, a scholar of great eminence of Sanskrit and Persian, to Delhi in 1716 AD. Furrukhsiyar allotted him a fief on the shores of a canal, i.e. ‘nahar’ near the red fort, after which the family came to be known as the ‘Kaul Nahars’.

Raj Kaul was the son of the cook, Ganga Ram Brahmin’s (the infamous Gangu). He served in Guru Gobind Singh ji’s kitchen for 20 years and later betrayed them by getting Mother Gujri ji and 2 younger sons of Guru Gobind Singh ji captured by the Mughals. The Mughal (Vajeer Khan) not only retracted from giving the promised reward to Gangu but also took away Mother Gujri ji’s property from his possession. This same Gangu’s son Raj Kaul ran away to Kashmir in fear of the retaliation of the Sikhs. Since he was educated he was working on a government job. When the later Mughal, Farrukhsiyar came to know of the favour that Gangu did to the Mughals, he found out his family (Raj Kaul) and asked them to come back to Delhi.
This is how the family is related to Mughals.

How these Kashmiri pandits converted to Islam?

So Raj Kaul belongs to a family of Kashmiri pandits, the Ganga Ram Brahmin’s. But this Raj Kaul later converted to Islam due to the influence of Mughals. 

How they have adopted the name Nehru as their surname?

Raj Kaul’s grandson is Gangadhar Nehru whose real name is Gayasuddin Ghazi. He was the City Kotwal i.e. police officer of Delhi prior to the uprising of 1857, under the Mughal rule.

(Jawaharlal Nehru's second sister Krishna Hutheesing also mentions in her memoirs that her grandfather was the city Kotwal of Delhi prior to 1857’s uprising when Bahadur Shah Zafar was still the sultan of Delhi)

So the question is why the Gayasuddin ghazi has changed his name to Gangadhar Nehru? 

After capturing Delhi in 1857, in the year of the mutiny, the British were slaughtering all Mughals everywhere. The British made a thorough search and killed every Mughal so that there would be no future claimant to the throne of Delhi. The Hindus on the other hand were not targeted by the British unless isolated Hindus were found to be siding with the Mughals, due to past associations. Therefore, it became customary for many Mohammedans to adopt Hindu names. So, the man Ghiyasuddin Ghazi (the word means kafir-killer) adopted a Hindu name Gangadhar Nehru and thus saved his life by the subterfuge. Ghiyasuddin Ghazi apparently used to reside on the bank of a canal (or Nahar) near the Red Fort as I have already told you earlier. Thus, he adopted the name ‘Nehru’ as the family name. Throughout the world, we do not find any descendant other than that of Gangadhar, having the surname Nehru. 

City Kotwal was an important post like today’s Commissioner of Police. It appears from Mughal records that there was no Hindu Kotwal employed. It was extremely unlikely for a Hindu to be hired for that post. Compulsorily only Mohammedans of foreign ancestry were hired for such important posts.

You can find the fact that how this family adopted the name Gandhi in my next article. Keep reading...

Gandhi Nehru Family Myth Exposed Part 3


So this is my third article in Gandhi Nehru family myth exposed. In this article i am going to reveal the fact that how this family had adopted the name Gandhi as their surname. 

In my previous articles in the series, i told you how kashmiri pandits became kaul nehars and adopted the name Nehru and how these brahmins converted to islam and started behaving as hindus after the advant of british.

You are all aware that Indira Priyadarshini was born as the daughter to Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru and his wife Smt. Kamla Nehru at Anand Bhawan, Allahabad in 1917 (November 19th). But in fact She is maimuna begum and was actually born to kamala and Manzoor ali.  Whereas the Nehrus – Motilal and Jawaharlal, along with his sister Vijay Laxmi – used to live in an acquired western sophistication and aristocracy to an extreme, Kamla Nehru-beautiful to look at-belonged to a very simple and orthodox middle class pandit family of Kashmir. Keeping the family tradition of the Nehrus, Kamla Nehru also became politically very active and led the 1932 Civil Disobedience movement at Allahabad, mobilizing thousands of women workers here. Still, Kamla failed miserably at the home front where she had to cope up with the aristocratic western manners of the family all the time having to learn the dining or other etiquette of western style of living. Kamla Nehru ultimately died of consumption (Tuberculosis) in a Switzerland sanatorium in 1936.

Indira Priyadarshini perpetuated immorality in the Nehru dynasty. Intellectual Indira was admitted in Oxford University but driven out from there for non-performance. She was then admitted to Shantiniketan University but, Guru Dev Rabindranath Tagore chased her out for bad conduct.

The matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdeveanor, the lonely girl was all by herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital.
Indira Priyadarshini, being lonely and finding her father being wedded to the cause of the National Movement of India, in her lonely adolescent days, feroze Khan, son of a grocer named Nawab Khan who supplied wines etc to Motilal Nehru’s household in Allahabad, was able to draw close to her, got more and more attracted towards this parsi gentleman named ‘Feroz Gandhy’ or ‘Gundhi’.


(Proof: The then Governor of Maharashtra, Dr. Shriprakash warned Nehru, that Indira was having an illicit relation with Feroze Khan)

Feroz, incidentally, came to live at Anand Bhawan itself late in the decade of the 1930s. Although the family history and profession of Feroz Gandhy had remained controversial, generally it is contended that he was born of parents of whom the mother Rati Mai Gundhy was a Parsi and father Jehangir Fardoon or Nawab khan was an Irani/Parsi- because of which sometimes he is shown as a Muslim too. Feroz Gundhy, although was born at Bombay, his father belonged to Bharuch in Gujrat. In fact his Parsi maternal surname, Gundhy, is said to be associated with the ancestral family business of ‘Gundhis’ i.e. the perfume-sellers.

Feroze Khan was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira. Soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. 

So, Nehru asked the young man Feroze Khan to change his surname from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion from Islam to Hinduism. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi, though it is an inconsistent name like Bismillah Sarma. Both changed their names to fool the public of India. When they returned to India, despite all opposition, Indira Priyadarshini Nehru was tied into the knots of wed-lock in 1941 with Feroz Gandhy through a silent Vedic ceremony held at Anand Bhawan itself for public consumption. And thus, Indira Priyadarshini Nehru became Indira Priyadarshini ‘Gundhy’.


Mahatma Gandhi, though blessed the couple, had neither any blood relations nor any legal ties with them. Moreover, Feroz Gandhy had nothing to do even with the Gujarati community in general. Both Nehru and Gandhi are fancy names. As a chameleon changes its colour, this dynasty have been changing its name to hide its real identity.


This is how this Family has been cheating this country nearly for the last 100 yrs.

Sunday, 24 February 2013

Sethusamudram project - Center Going Ahead


The UPA government has rejected the RK Pachauri Committee report that had found the entire Sethusamudram project unviable on two fronts – economically as ecologically. The Pachauri Committee had submitted its report to the Supreme Court on its direction.


In response to the committee report, the government made it clear on friday (22 Mar 2013) that it intended to pursue the project cutting through the Adam’s Bridge, popularly known as Ram Setu. “Government does not accept the conclusions and recommendations of the Pachauri Committee. Given the advantages of the project, the Government of India intends to pursue the implementation of the project,” read the government affidavit, requesting SC to resolve the ‘contentious issues’ raised before it.

BJP chief spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said, “The government’s affidavit is not the last word. The Ram Sethu is not a simple architectural symbol. It has the cult status of a deity.”

A bunch of petitions opposing the project are pending before SC since 2007 for adjudication. Work on the Sethusamudram project stopped after SC ordered a stay against the dredging work. It had then constituted the Pachauri committee to study an alternative route. The committee, however, called for scrapping the project.

Environmentalists, too, are up in arms against the project, arguing that it will destroy the ecology of the area.

The Pachauri committee was formed in 2008 to honour observations in this regard by then Chief Justice K. G. Balakrishnan in midst of a controversy over the government ignoring environmental concerns and religious sentiments.

Saturday, 23 February 2013

FDI in India - Advantages and Disadvantages



Overview

First of all, FDI means Foreign Direct Investment which is mainly dealings with monetary matters and using this way they acquires standalone position in the Indian economy. Their policy is very simple to remove rivals. In beginning days they sell products at low price so other competitor shut down in few months. And then companies like Wall-Mart will increase prices than actual product price.



They are focusing on national and international economic concerns. There are four main working pillars of FDI. They are financial collaborations, technical collaborations and joint ventures, capital markets via Euro issues, and private placements or preferential allotments.

There are two types of FDI, one is inward FDI and second is outward FDI. Ongoing news suggests that largest retailer Wal-Mart has demanded for 51% of international dealings in FDI in Indian markets which had called nationwide strike. From positive and negative aspects FDI has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Advantages
  • Increase economic growth by dealing with different international products
  • 1 million (1 Crore) employment will create in three years - UPA Government
  • Billion dollars will be invested in Indian market
  • Spread import and export business in different countries
  • Agriculture related people will get good price of their goods
Disadvantages
  • Will affect 50 million merchants in India
  • Profit distribution, investment ratios are not fixed
  • An economically backward class person suffers from price raise
  • Retailer faces loss in business
  • Market places are situated too far which increases traveling expenses
  • Workers safety and policies are not mentioned clearly
  • Inflation may be increased
  • Again India become slaves because of FDI in retail sector

Akbaruddin Owaisi's Controversial Speech at Nirmal. Adilabad


On December 24 2012, Owaisi addressed a rally of twenty to twenty-five thousand Muslims in the Nirmal town of Adilabad district of Andhra Pradesh. In his two-hour long speech, Owaisi made several inflammatory, disparaging and derogatory comments against Hindus, Hindu deities, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Vishva Hindu Parishad, Bharatiya Janata Party, Narendra Modi, India, and United States of America.

His speech resembles the speeches made by many terrorist organisation's leaders like Maulana Massod Azhar etc. In countries like Pakistan terrorists can directly address people of the country publicly who are also terrorists almost. But here how can this terrorist, so called Indian MLA make such a contraversial speech...?

Inflammatory comments in his speech:

1. Owaisi made several derogatory comments against Hindu deity Rama and his mother Kaushalya. Questioning the birth and the birthplace of Rama, Owaisi asked "where all did Kaushalya go to give birth to Rama and where all did Rama take birth". Owaisi also mocked Hindu panentheism saying Hindus have many gods and goddesses, and every eight days, new gods keep coming up. In a reference to the Bhagyalakshmi temple, he said, "We knew about Lakshmi, but who is Bhagyalakshmi, we are not aware." We can wash away the Bhagya lakshmi temple with the our spit...

2. Owaisi repeatedly called Ajmal Amir Kasab, one of the Pakistani militants of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, a "child", and compared him to Narendra Modi. He asked if Kasab was hanged then why is Modi not hanged, and said that the reason was only because Kasab was a Pakistani and Modi is Indian. He said that if the Muslims of India united like the Muslims of Andhra Pradesh, Narendra Modi would soon be hanged. Owaisi threatened that if his words were not heard, "O India, destruction and ruin will be your fate". He also dared Narendra Modi to come to Hyderabad, threatening by saying "we will show him then". Owaisi justified the Mumbai bombings of 1993 by saying they were a reaction to the demotion of Babri Masjid. He also questioned the punishment handed out to the accused of the bombings, naming Tiger Memon as one of those punished even though Tiger Memon is still at large. 

3. Owaisi made the statement that "the population of your Hindustan (India) is 1 billion, while we Muslims are 250 million." He added that Muslims of India would need only 15 minutes without the police to show the Hindus of India who is more powerful - the Hindustan of 1 billion or the 250 million Muslims". We can kill more Hindus then those who were killed in the last 1000 years. The crowd responded to this statement by shouting slogans of "Allah-Hu-Akbar" and the leaders present at the meeting supported Owaisi. Owaisi called the Hindus as "impotent" and the Indian police as the "impotent army". He said that not even one crore impotent men can together father one child. He said that these people (Hindus) cannot face the Muslims, and whenever the Muslims start dominating the Hindus, the impotent army (police) intervenes.

4. Owaisi compared the state of Muslims of India to the state of Muslims of the world and blamed India and America for the same. Owaisi said that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the Vishva Hindu Parishad, and the Bharatiya Janata Party were poisonous snakes, and to "crush their heads" a stick is enough.

5. He also said that he will not allow the Hindus to celebrate their festivals in muslim majority areas.

I don't understand the intention of this terrorist, which made him to deliver this kind of speeches... Remember Akbaruddin, you don't know the significance of either the Hinduism or the Hindus. Hinduism is the worlds oldest living religion. you don't even have the eligibility to call the names of Hindu deities or the Hindu culture.

Hindus are the peace loving people, its because of their patience for the last 1000 years, you have become a part of our country. That's why you are still living here in our country. 

What did you say? Do you think that you can kill Hindus in Hindustan? We are not even in a position to laugh at your jokes... May be you don't remember "Operation Polo" of Sardar Vallabhai Patel. 

Operation polo:

Operation polo is the  military operation made by Sardar vallabhai patel over nijam. It is Rijwa, the nijam ambassador  that is responsible for this military operation and the blood shed. Before the operation there was a meeting of Rijwa with Patel ji. 

Rijwa and Sardar's Meeting Highlights:

Rijwa: I dont't understand what is this Indian government is thinking about us. Do you think that you can clear off the Nijam rulers with your military? I am warning you, there are 1.26 crore people are living in Hyderabad. We are going to kill all those Hindus in front of you. Get ready for that, no one can even dare to touch Nijam. Hyderabad is nijam's forever, no one can rule it.

Sardar vallabhai patel ji: So you are going to kill 1.26 crores of Hindus?    

Rijwa: Yes

Sardar vallabhai patel ji: Ok, let's see what happens. Get ready to face our military and you will see what we can do...! Its time to take care of your Nijam, your property and families...



After the operation Nijam got surrendered to Sardar ji.

This will happen again to you Mr. Akbaruddin, if you provoke Hindu people.  Akbaruddin - you can try your best to instigate poor uneducated muslims- unfortunately you can do nothing. Hinduism survived the mughals and the british - guys like you, taliban etc can try their best but we are too big and strong for you. In India you spread haterd against Hindus, in Europe & Africa against the christians and in countries like Pakistan (sharia country-- allah's own country - the most miserable country in the world) Iraq, Syria you kill each other- that is Islam for you.

A true educated Indian Muslim can never be you fan. Remember that.

But one thing is clear, Hindus are themselves to be blamed for getting killed and maimed in their own country even after 1000 yrs genocide, rape and plunder by Islam... Hindus are so dumb and corrupt that they would make an Italian dancing girl as PM of the nation or else they would make her dumb illiterate cub as their PM. No doubt everywhere Hindus get beaten up... In pakistan or any Islamic country can a Hindu get away with such a speech, leave alone killing a single muslim in a Riot? No doubt India will soon become an hot bed of islam and Jihadi center!!

You can watch the complete speech of Akbaruddin here:


I am awaiting for your suggestions...

Sunday, 17 February 2013

First Medical Surgery in the world in Ancient India




The Origin of the Plastic Surgery??

Many people consider Plastic Surgery as a relatively new specialty, the origin of the plastic surgery had his roots
more than 4000 years old in India, back to the Indus River Civilization. The mythico-religious shlokas (hymns) associated with this civilization were compiled in Sanskrit language between 3000 and 1000 B.C. in the form of Vedas, the oldest sacred books of the Hindu religion. This era is referred to as the Vedic period (5000 years B.C) in Indian history during which the the four Vedas, namely the Rigveda, the Samaveda, the Yajurveda, and the Atharvaveda were compiled. All the four Vedas are in the form of shlokas (hymns), verses, incantations and rites in Sanskrit language.
‘Sushruta Samhita' is believed to be a part of Atharvaveda.


Plastic Surgery – was first performed in India around 2000 BC and then popularized in the Arab world that actually launched it to Europe. The person behind this groundbreaking medical practice in India was Sushruta. He is credited for performing the first rhinoplasty (nose-job) with a unique understanding of the circulation system.


Cataract surgery - Cataract surgery was also known to the him (Indian physician Sushruta) in 6th century BCE. In India, cataract surgery was performed with a special tool called the Jabamukhi Salaka, a curved needle used to loosen the lens and push the cataract out of the field of vision. The eye would later be soaked with warm butter and then bandaged. Though this method was successful, Susruta cautioned that cataract surgery should only be performed when absolutely necessary. Greek philosophers and scientists traveled to India where these surgeries were performed by physicians. The removal of cataract by surgery was also introduced into China from India.


Stones - The earliest operation for removal of a stone is also given in the Sushruta Samhita (6th century BCE). The operation involved exposure and going up through the floor of the bladder.

‘Sushruta Samhita'(Sushruta's compendium), which describes the ancient tradition of surgery in Indian medicine is considered as one of the most brilliant gems in Indian medical literature. This treatise contains detailed descriptions of teachings and practice of the great ancient surgeon 'Sushruta' which has considerable surgical knowledge of relevance even today.


Because of his seminal and numerous contributions to the science and art of surgery he is also known by the title "Father of Surgery." Much of what is known about this inventive surgeon is contained in a series of volumes he authored, which are collectively known as the Sushruta Samhita in which he describes over 300 surgical procedures and 120 surgical instruments and classifies human surgery in 8 categories. He lived, taught and practiced his art on the banks of the Ganges in the area that corresponds to the present day city of Varanasi in North India.

Medicine & Surgery : 
An artist's impression of an operation being performed in ancient India. In spite of the absence of anesthesia, complex operations were performed. The practice of surgery has been recorded in India around 800 B.C. This need not come as a surprise because surgery (Shastrakarma) is one ofthe eight branches of Ayurveda the ancient Indian system of medicine. The oldest treatise dealing with surgery is the Shushruta Samahita (Shushruta's compendium). Shusruta who lived in Kasi was one of themany Indian medical practitioners who included Atraya and Charaka. He was one of the first to study the human anatomy. In the Shusruta, Samahita he has described in detail the study of anatomy withthe aid of a dead body. Shusruta's forte was rhinoplasty (Plastic surgery)and ophthalmialogy (ejection of cataracts). Shushruta has described surgery under eight heads Chedya (excision), Lekhya (scarification),Vedhya (puncturing), Esya (exploration), Ahrya (extraction), Vsraya (evacuation) and Sivya (Suturing).
Yoga is a system of exercise for physical and mental nourishment. The origins of yoga are shrouded in antiquity and mystery. Since Vedic times, thousand of years before, the principles and practice of yoga have crystallized. But, it was only around 200 BC that all the fundamentals of yoga were collected by Patanjali in his treatise, named Yogasutra, that is, Yoga-Aphorisms.
In short, Patanjali surmised that through the practice of yoga, the energy latent within the human body may be made live and released, which has a salubrious affect on the body and the mind. Now, in modern times, clinical practices have established that several ailments, including hypertension, clinical depression, amnesia, acidity, can be controlled and managed by yogic practices. The application of yoga in physiotherapy is also gaining recognition.

Sushruta has pointed out that haemorrhage can be arrested by apposition of the cut edges with stitches, application of styptic decoctions, by cauterisation with chemicals or heat. That the progress of surgery and its development is closely associated with the great wars of the past is well known. The vrana or injury, says Sushruta, involves breakdown of body-components and may have one or more of the following seats for occurrence, viz., skin, flesh, blood-vessels, sinews, bones, joints, internal organs of chest and abdomen and vital structures. Classically vrana, the wound, is the ultimate explosion of the underlying pathological structure. It is, in Sushruta's words, the sixth stage of a continuous process, which starts with sotha (inflammation). Sushruta says that in the first stage, the ulcer is unclean and hence called a dusta-vrana. By proper management it becomes a clean wound, a suddha-vrana. Then there is an attempt at healing and is called ruhyamana-vrana and when the ulcer is completely healed, it is a rudha-vrana. Sushruta has advocated the use of wine with incense of cannabis for anaesthesia. Although the use of henbane and of Sammohini and Sanjivani are reported at a later period, Sushruta was the pioneer of anaesthesia.
Sushruta describes eight types of surgical procedures: Excision (chedana) is a procedure whereby a part or whole of the limb is cut off from the parent. Incision (bhedana) is made to achieve effective drainage or exposure of underlying structures to let the content out. Scraping (lekhana) or scooping is carried out to remove a growth or flesh of an ulcer, tartar of teeth, etc. the veins, hydrocele and ascitic fluid in the abdomen are drained by puncturing with special instrument (vyadhana). The sinuses and cavities with foreign bodies are probed (esana) for establishing their size, site, number, shape, position, situation, etc. Sravana (blood-letting) is to be carried out in skin diseases, vidradhis, localised swelling, etc. in case of accidental injuries and in intentional incisions, the lips of the wound are apposed and united by stitching (svana.)
To obtain proficiency and acquiring skill and speed in these different types of surgical manipulations, Sushruta had devised various experimental modules for trying each procedure. For example, incision and excision are to be practised on vegetables and leather bags filled with mud of different densities; scraping on hairy skin of animals; puncturing on the vein of dead animals and lotus stalks; probing on moth-eaten wood or bamboo; scarification on wooden planks smeared with beeswax, etc. On the subject of trauma, Sushruta speaks of six varieties of accidental injuries encompassing almost all parts of the body.
Sushruta also gives classification of the bones and their reaction to injuries. varieties of dislocation of joints (sandhimukta) and fractures of the shaft (kanda-bhagna) are given systematically. He classifies and gives the details of the six types of dislocations and twelve varieties of fractures. He gives the principles of fracture treatment, viz., traction, manipulation, appositions and stabilisation. Sushruta has described the entire orthopaedic surgery, including some measures of rehabilitation, in his work.
As war was a major cause of injury, the name Salya-tantra for this branch of medical learning is derived from Salya, the arrow of the enemy, which in fights used to be lodged in the body of the soldiers. He emphasises that removal of foreign bodies is fraught with certain complications if the seat of the Salya be a marma.
Sushruta also discusses certain surgical conditions of ano-rectal region, he has given all the methods of management of both haemorrhoids and fistulae. Different types of incision to remove the fistulous tract as langalaka, ardhalangalaka, sarvabhadra, candraadha (curved) and kharjurapatraka (serrated) are described for adoption according to the type of fistula.
Sushruta was well aware of the urinary stones, their varieties; the anatomy of urinary bladder along with its relations is well recorded in the chapter on urinary stones. Varieties of stones, their signs and symptoms, the method of extraction and operative complication are given in detail. Apart from the above, surgery of intestinal obstruction (baddha-gudodara), perforated intestines (chidrodara), accidental injuries to abdomen (assaya-bhinna) in which protrusion of omentum occurs are also described along with their management.

Tanjavur vs Pisa



Indian Architecture Clearly Explained:



On the right side is the leaning tower of pisa a bell tower of the cathedral of the italian city of pisa, the construction occurred in 3 stages across 177 years ,the tower began to 
sink after the construction progressed to the 2nd floor, the design was flawed right from the beginning, foundation was weak, soil was weak, no soil test was done, the construction was stopped due to a war, this allowed time for the underlying soil to settle, otherwise the tower would've surely toppled , a piece of architecture , which people (even ) indians consider a wonder, the tower is still under going structural strengthening even today ( started on aug 8th 1173 - 1372).



On the left side is the big temple (brihadeeswarar temple ) of thanjavur ,built by one of the greatest kings of india RAJA RAJA Chola and is one of the marvels of architecture, the temple tower is 216 ft high and is among the tallest of its kind in the world,an idea to build a mammoth temple like this is said to have occurred to raja raja while he stayed in eelam (sri lanka) as emperor, the gopuram(spire) was built over 12 years on a single piece of granite weighing around 80 tons,there are no mountains around 100 kms in the surrounding range from tanjavore, which contains huge rocks, then where this stones came from? How it was been carried ? for centuries this temple has fascinated, historians, artists and travelers, for its archtectural magnificence, it has been listed by unesco heritage list of historical sites, it is considered as the expression of the tamils wealth, power and artistic expertise, but here people don't even consider it as a site to go and see, built in 1010 ad and completed its 1000 year in 2010 ,
It is a living wonder



Sometimes we forget what we have and search outside...!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...